David Wiley’s talk on open education really caused me to
think about what’s currently going on in schools and in other
institutions. Our readings in
class also further sparked my interest. I sought find links between the open learning philosophy and
situated cognition.
I found another video clip that is kind of a “response” to
David Wiley’s talk about open education (see last post). In the video, we are asked “Where is
education going?” Is education
driven by big business?
He gives a history of the “lecture” and how lectures have
been delivered to learners over the centuries. Lectures --- interesting, gripping, topic? Actually, yes. Watching this video had me captivated
and caused me to reflect on current practices. His last sentence really struck
a chord with me: just because you
earned a degree by being lectured (for the most part), was your degree really an indicator to
potential employees as an indicator of your skills? Even harsher, will lecturing continue “unhindered by the
developments of technology”?
Take a look!
Are we still relying on “the lecture”? Even though it’s a parody, is this
really pure sarcasm or is he really that far off from what’s actually going on
in schools, universities, and training programs?
This short clip caused me to think about points Driscoll makes in her
chapter about situated cognition. Driscoll (2005) states “learning is a
co-constitutive process in which all participants change and are transformed
through their actions in the world” (p. 159) Lecturing is not very
“co-constitutive” but it’s a teaching strategy still heavily used today! Brown et al. (as cited in Driscoll,
2005) indicate that students often end up having “inert knowledge” and are
unable to apply what they’ve learned in real-life situations (p. 161). I get the classic question in my math courses, "When are we going to use this in real life?" Do we have to have an answer to this question every time? Maybe not, but we should at least indicate to the students where they are going, why, and make the material applicable as much as possible. Driscoll also notes that learners
should be able to be able to be an “apprentice”, interact with the learning
community, and be allowed to
reflect critically on their learning.
Lecturing is one way – but it’s still so popular! I guess you can think critically after the lecture when you are at home. So, open-learning and situated learning could go hand in hand. It allows one to access to learning, all the while being social at the same time.
I do feel efforts are being made for collaborative learning. I was just discussing with my grade 12
students about course selections at the university for next year. Many signed up for “learning
communities”. Online courses are
offering opportunities to collaborate, even from a distance. Is anything else being done, or is the
change occurring at a slower rate than it should? Or, is it just policy holding us back?
Driscoll, M. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed). Boston, MA: Pearson
A&B
Dave was responding, I'm pretty sure, to a MOOC (massive open online course) on connectivism taught by George Siemens and Stephen Downes--a radically different approach to building learning environments. So I think Dave is trying to do what he does best -- make people consider a contrary perspective.
ReplyDeleteIf we're talking about schools and universities certifying skills of the workforce so they can go get jobs, then lectures make little sense. But of course that isn't all schools and universities do. They promote and celebrate learning, reflection, and intellectual growth of all kinds. I'm not sure many of us will ever use iambic pentameter in a job application, but we learn about it because poetry is part of expanding our intellectual horizons. So maybe in other contexts, lectures have a place. Not the only place, for sure, but to be part of a rich landscape of learning opportunities and resources -- the building blocks we use to make meaning for ourselves (hmmm.... situated cognition?).
Situated cognition indeed, Rick --- with a dash of constructivism thrown in as well!!
ReplyDelete